monster rear tire - Victory Forums - Victory Motorcycle Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 05:54 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 50
Default monster rear tire

the brand is what I'm talking about, haha

http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-RADIAL-M...item1c1be067fe

Less than $200 to your door is much cheaper than our alternatives, but they have some funky sizes.

http://veerubberusa.com/motorcycle/v...?Pname=monster

This is their site. So question is has anyone run one of these? The 260/35 would be about 1/3" shorter than a factory 250/40 so it should have little effect on the speedo.
wmskateteam is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 06:03 PM
Lifetime Premium
 
saddlebag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 5,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wmskateteam View Post
So question is has anyone run one of these?
Not on a bike, but I had some very similar Goodyear Gatorbacks on a Firebird back in the 80s.




https://www.victoryforums.com/signaturepics/sigpic6903_1.gif
2011 Cross Roads
saddlebag is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 08:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SOUTH FLORIDA
Posts: 353
Default

wonder how it will handle and look compared to a 260-40-18 ????
since that is the norm size for a 260 at least from metzler !

2007 VEGAS ( BIG BALLS )

www.houseofthunderusa.com
DAREDEVIL is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-08-2012, 09:41 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 50
Default

the 260/40 and 260/35 difference might be enough to have mounting issues, so I was trying to see if anyone here has tried it. The vee rubber tires are supposed to have great tread life and are significantly less than the metzeler.
The 250 *.4 = 104 mm diameter
The 260 *.4 = 100 mm diameter
The 260 *.35 = 91 mm diameter
Which in my original post I mentioned only a 1/3" difference, I now stand corrected as I was comparing that to the 260/40. It is a 13mm difference from the stock diameter which results in about a half an inch difference so roughly a 1.2 mph difference at 60 mph. So not enough for me to be concerend about, but the 260/35 will be wider than both the 250/40 and 260/40 and with a shorter sidewall might lead to mounting issues.
wmskateteam is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-08-2012, 10:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SOUTH FLORIDA
Posts: 353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wmskateteam View Post
the 260/40 and 260/35 difference might be enough to have mounting issues, so I was trying to see if anyone here has tried it. The vee rubber tires are supposed to have great tread life and are significantly less than the metzeler.
The 250 *.4 = 104 mm diameter
The 260 *.4 = 100 mm diameter
The 260 *.35 = 91 mm diameter
Which in my original post I mentioned only a 1/3" difference, I now stand corrected as I was comparing that to the 260/40. It is a 13mm difference from the stock diameter which results in about a half an inch difference so roughly a 1.2 mph difference at 60 mph. So not enough for me to be concerend about, but the 260/35 will be wider than both the 250/40 and 260/40 and with a shorter sidewall might lead to mounting issues.
NOW, u need to explain to me why a 260/35 would be wider then a 260/40 ????

The 260mm is the same on both...

2007 VEGAS ( BIG BALLS )

www.houseofthunderusa.com
DAREDEVIL is offline  
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-08-2012, 03:09 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 50
Default

That part is unable to be determined without actually mounting the tire or at least I should say I don't know how to determine it. I usually research tirerack prior to purchasing tires for dimension comparisons as they have an extensive amount of specs for most tires they sell, but I haven't found a similar source for motorcycle tires yet. Basically the first number the 260 is the section width when divided by 25.4 (conversion from mm to inches) = 10.24"
10.24 x .4 = 4.1" sidewall height
10.24 x .35 = 3.6" sidewall height
The second numer is the aspect ratio or profile. The lower the second number the shorter the overal diameter gets and the wider the tread width gets. So if you looked at truck tires you would see a high second number like 60 or 70, these tires would have a tall sidewall and a skinnier tread width. I'm probably just being confusing at this point....
wmskateteam is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-08-2012, 06:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SOUTH FLORIDA
Posts: 353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wmskateteam View Post
That part is unable to be determined without actually mounting the tire or at least I should say I don't know how to determine it. I usually research tirerack prior to purchasing tires for dimension comparisons as they have an extensive amount of specs for most tires they sell, but I haven't found a similar source for motorcycle tires yet. Basically the first number the 260 is the section width when divided by 25.4 (conversion from mm to inches) = 10.24"
10.24 x .4 = 4.1" sidewall height
10.24 x .35 = 3.6" sidewall height
The second numer is the aspect ratio or profile. The lower the second number the shorter the overal diameter gets and the wider the tread width gets. So if you looked at truck tires you would see a high second number like 60 or 70, these tires would have a tall sidewall and a skinnier tread width. I'm probably just being confusing at this point....
OK, now .. let me explain u how i see it ( FACT ) 260mm is 260mm and if the sidewall is 35 % then it would actually be not as wide as if it would be 40% aspect ratio since the tire is beeing pulled in more if mounted on the same wheel.
The only thing that could be is that the 260 Monster is a tat wider then the 260 Metzler since they sometimes use 260 as a ballpark and not as a real messurement !

But it has nothing or even the oposit to do with the aspect ratio !!!

2007 VEGAS ( BIG BALLS )

www.houseofthunderusa.com
DAREDEVIL is offline  
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-08-2012, 10:30 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 50
Default

if you sat the two tires next to each other the
260/40 is slightly taller and skinnier when compared to
260/35 which would be slightly shorter and wider
The odd shape of motorcycle tires when compared to automotive tires probably has less of an effect. If you looked at a 285/40 and 285/30 car tire the difference would be noticable, but that is because of the shape of the automotive tire. I'm probably over analyzing these tires, but I have spent a lot of time maxing the tire sizes on cars and it's spilling over to motos.
wmskateteam is offline  
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-08-2012, 10:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 109
Default

Just a couple of notes:

1) speed rating is 1 step lower than both E3's and ME880's (H vs V)
2) the Dunlop E3 (OEM) 250/40VR18 is $189 to your door (on sale right now @ motorcycle-superstore.com, not sure what their regular price is though)

2010 Black Jackpot - Tri-Pro 2>1 exhaust, hydralic clutch, & a little bit of bling!
seattlerob is offline  
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old 02-09-2012, 05:06 AM
Lifetime Premium
 
gibson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: North east Indiana
Posts: 1,181
Default

http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalcold.html type your numbers in here and it will show you width and height on a car

2012 Fireball Jackpot

Last edited by gibson; 02-09-2012 at 05:10 AM. Reason: spelling
gibson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Victory Forums - Victory Motorcycle Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome