OK so the new big inch Indian puts out 3ft/lbs more torque as my souped up Vegas 109.
But we know Polaris claim torque at the crank not the back wheel, mines at the back wheel.
Daresay my Vegas would weigh a bit less than an ***** dresser too.
Bet the Vegas revs harder and quicker too!
Dunno what my XCs 116 rear wheel torque would translate to at the crank?
Someone here would know. ..
Looks more like a Harley Street Glide to me which are nice looking bikes but if it's black you'll have a hard time finding it in the parking lot at a bike meet.
Exactly why when my 2017 Chieftain Dark Horse got Totaled bought the Current 2011 XC with 21,000 Miles now riding, so far after 2,000 miles quite happy made this decision ..
They are getting there, slowly.
Look at Indian now versus several years ago. Changes being made. Less rolling chrome monument. Slowly creeping in more modern touches. Trying not to anger old timers.
I like what I see in the small changes but a while to go yet.
That is what I meant. Inspired by Victory. Now they need to throw that new engine inside it and we might have something worth buying.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Victory Motorcycle Forum
497.1K posts
48.6K members
Since 2007
A forum community dedicated to Victory Motorcycle owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, modifications, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!