the people that have used both. How is the look and performance between the Dunlop and the Metzeler? Is there any at all.
Just replaced mine with the stock sized Dunlops at 9600 mi. So I really can't help you with comparing the two but there are many threads comparing them on other forums and from what I've read the Metz's are stickier but don't last near as long (can't get something for nothing).
I decided that getting the extra mileage and saving a little green was more important to me. Either way, after putting 500 miles on the new ones it still handles like a new bike. The difference between the ones that were on the wear marks and the new tires is night and day.
Plus, the Metz's are not as wide as the Dunnies and I like that fat tire!

If I decide to go to the 300 I'll probably go with the Metz.
What's a post without pictures right?
Here's one of a tire comparison... I think I got it from another forum and was posted by KevinX, if so, thanks Kevin!
(The 250 is the Dunlop and the rest are Metz, as you can see, the 260 Metz has a rounder profile.)
And here's one of my JP on my homemade stand with the wheels off and to the HD dealer for mounting. I got both tires from RMATV for ~$280.00 to my door (in two days) and HD charged me $60 for the mounting. I run a 90/90 on front and neither tire took any balancing even though I bought some beads.
I know I didn't answer your question but I hope this helps anyway.
